OUR BLOG

Entrapment, a legal defense strategy, asserts that individuals were induced or persuaded by law enforcement to commit a crime they otherwise would not have committed. In Colorado, this defense can be pivotal in solicitation cases, where individuals are accused of attempting to persuade others to engage in criminal activity. Understanding the concept of entrapment, its application under Colorado law, and the burden of proof required to establish it as a defense is crucial for those facing solicitation charges and their legal representatives.

Understanding Entrapment

Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers use coercion, harassment, or deceitful tactics to induce individuals to commit crimes they would not have otherwise committed. This defense asserts that the criminal intent originated with the government rather than the defendant. However, it’s essential to note that mere solicitation or providing an opportunity to commit a crime does not constitute entrapment unless law enforcement’s conduct creates a substantial risk of inducing criminal activity.

Application of Entrapment in Colorado Law

Colorado recognizes the entrapment defense under its criminal laws. To establish entrapment, the defendant must prove two key elements:

1. Government Inducement: The defendant must demonstrate that law enforcement agents engaged in conduct that induced or persuaded them to commit the crime. This can include persistent solicitation, pressure, threats, or promises of reward.
2. Lack of Predisposition: The defendant must also show that they lacked a predisposition to commit the offense independently of the government’s actions. This involves presenting evidence of their character, past behavior, and any reluctance to engage in criminal conduct prior to the alleged entrapment.

Burden of Proof

Entrapment cases place the burden of proof on the defendant. This means that the defendant must provide sufficient evidence to convince the court that entrapment occurred. Establishing entrapment requires presenting compelling evidence of government inducement and the absence of predisposition. This can involve witness testimony, recordings of interactions with law enforcement, and expert analysis of the defendant’s behavior and mental state.

Navigating the Challenges of Asserting Entrapment

While entrapment can be a viable defense strategy, it’s important to acknowledge the challenges defendants may encounter when attempting to prove entrapment in solicitation cases. Law enforcement agencies are often skilled in conducting undercover operations and may employ sophisticated tactics to gather evidence and secure convictions. As such, defendants must carefully scrutinize the circumstances surrounding their interactions with law enforcement officers to identify instances of inducement or coercion.

One common challenge in asserting an entrapment defense is the perception of predisposition. Prosecutors may argue that the defendant exhibited a predisposition to commit the offense based on past behavior or statements made during the course of the investigation. Defendants must be prepared to counter these assertions by presenting evidence of their reluctance to engage in criminal activity prior to the alleged entrapment. This may involve providing testimony from friends, family members, or colleagues attesting to the defendant’s character and moral integrity.

Additionally, defendants should be aware of the potential consequences of asserting an entrapment defense. While successfully proving entrapment can lead to the dismissal of charges, it may also result in increased scrutiny from law enforcement and prosecutors. Defendants may face additional investigations or charges related to their interactions with undercover officers, requiring diligent legal representation to navigate these complexities effectively.

While entrapment can be a valuable defense strategy in Colorado solicitation cases, defendants must be prepared to overcome various challenges in asserting this defense. By carefully analyzing the circumstances of their interactions with law enforcement, presenting compelling evidence of inducement or coercion, and working closely with experienced criminal defense attorneys, defendants can improve their chances of success in challenging solicitation allegations.

Building a Strong Defense

Given the complexities of entrapment cases, individuals facing solicitation charges should seek the assistance of experienced criminal defense lawyers. These attorneys understand Colorado’s entrapment laws and can assess the circumstances to determine the viability of an entrapment defense. They can also gather evidence, interview witnesses, and develop persuasive arguments to support the defendant’s claim of entrapment.

Colorado Solicitation Cases

Entrapment can be a powerful defense strategy in Colorado solicitation cases, but successfully establishing it requires meeting a high burden of proof. By understanding entrapment’s concept, its application under Colorado law, and the burden of proof required, individuals facing solicitation charges can work with their legal representatives to build a strong defense. With the guidance of experienced criminal defense lawyers, defendants can navigate the legal process effectively and seek the best possible outcome in their case.

About the Author:

Denver-based criminal defense and DUI attorney Jacob E. Martinez is a knowledgeable and experienced litigator with a record of success providing innovative solutions to clients facing criminal charges of any severity. Countless legal organizations have recognized Mr. Martinez for his exemplary defense work, including Avvo, Best DWI Attorneys, Expertise, Lawyers of Distinction, The National Trial Lawyers, and others. He was also named one of the 10 Best in Client Satisfaction in Colorado by the American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys and is Lead Counsel rated.